I wanted to test out the 50-140mm ƒ2.8, luckily I was invited to a wedding, which was the perfect opportunity to shoot some portraits.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3595c/3595cb210a67a949a8cf796d727162b62c0e2a43" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2985b/2985b37701fbb7603009b6c8aac5a0ceaebd69ea" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37cc5/37cc50b2594941e54ee662ca5a4f4e2a107279db" alt=""
This lens is incredibly sharp, probably the sharpest lens i own, the subject (my brother) is well separated from the background. Previously I used my 50mm ƒ2 for portraits, this lens blows the 50mm right out of the water, the 1-stop difference (ƒ2 vs ƒ2.8) can be easily compensated by using a greater focal range.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2864/f286481a6363699fb6cb2c88fe01d5043cce5edf" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14d24/14d244215ebd54becde4724139f031470893bbc2" alt=""
The bokeh is a little bit swirly (look at the 2nd picture) but I really like the look. So will this replace the 50mm? Probably not, because this lens is nearly 9 times the weight of the 50mm (1770g vs 200g). I love the 50mm because it is so compact, I always have it in my messenger bag. the 50-140mm is far too heavy for that.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2dd1/a2dd147c96c8012bbb27eb3cb80e42ef9468b0db" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c411/4c411cfcd898d3240b9ff6313b380412d1dd03d5" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10f51/10f51e44149ec10732cc6e15e4088a8245e391a7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcca9/dcca965168237e8b2648c01464e262d870a5e860" alt=""